[caldeveloper-l] Recurrence override with RRULE

[Neil Jenkins]

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, at 3:14 AM, Jeffrey Harris wrote:
> It’s weird to have RRULEs which don’t match DTSTART, but they’re
> legal, you just have to remember to always include DTSTART as the
> first occurrence.
As a point of interest, the spec actually says the behaviour in this
case is undefined[1]:
      The "DTSTART" property
      value SHOULD be synchronized with the recurrence rule, if
      specified.  The recurrence set generated with a "DTSTART" property      value not synchronized with the recurrence rule is undefined.

In practice however, all servers/clients handle this in the same way.

Neil.

Links:

  1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5545#section-3.8.5.3
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.calconnect.org/pipermail/caldeveloper-l-calconnect.org/attachments/20180410/edccd75f/attachment.html>