[caldeveloper-l] FW: Questions on rfc7265

[Robert Stepanek]

Hi Vivek,

My original reply to your mail bounced because  I just switched email
addresses for this list.
At CalConnect, the TC-API workgroup is in the process of defining a new
JSON-based calendaring data format that should fit your use case.
I've co-authored the spec and we have recently submitted it to IETF. It
is currently a RFC draft and the specification might still change, but
the format is already in use in multiple products (SchedJoules,
FastMail).
As Gren pointed out, the RFC draft is at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jenkins-jscalendar/ and includes
examples (section 6.1) as well as a guide for translation from/to
iCalendar.
I'd be happy to receive any feedback on the new format.

Cheers,
Robert


On Wed, Aug 16, 2017, at 15:58, Vivek Kamath wrote:
> Thanks Gren!  We will take a look at this. 


>  


> Vivek


>  


> * ***


> Vivek Kamath
> *Engineering Team Owner*
> Virtual, San Diego CA

> Mobile: (858) 848-0157


> www.ultimatesoftware.com | Follow US: LinkedIn[1] | Twitter[2] |
> People First Blog[3]


>>  


>  


> *From:  *Gren Elliot <gren.elliot at synacor.com> *Date: *Wednesday,
> August 16, 2017 at 2:43 AM *To: *Vivek Kamath
> <Vivek_Kamath at ultimatesoftware.com>, "caldeveloper-
> l at lists.calconnect.org" <caldeveloper-l at lists.calconnect.org> *Cc:
> *Jeff Kwak <jeff_kwak at ultimatesoftware.com> *Subject: *Re: [caldeveloper-
> l] FW: Questions on rfc7265>  


> Hi Vivek,


>  


> Have you seen https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jenkins-jscalendar-00
> - JSCalendar: A JSON representation of calendar data?> That may or may not be closer to what you are looking for and there is
> a reasonable chance of widespread adoption in the future - although
> this is the first official draft and is very recent.>  


> Regards,


> Gren


>  


>
> From: Vivek Kamath<vivek_kamath at ultimatesoftware.com> Reply: Vivek
> Kamath <vivek_kamath at ultimatesoftware.com> Date: 15 August 2017 at
> 20:42:39 To: caldeveloper-l at lists.calconnect.org  <caldeveloper-
> l at lists.calconnect.org> Cc: Jeff Kwak <jeff_kwak at ultimatesoftware.com>
> Subject:  [caldeveloper-l] FW: Questions on rfc7265> 


>> Sending message to mailing list based on Cyrus Daboo’s suggestion.
>> Can someone help?  Based on what Cyrus said, looks like there is a
>> revised json specification in works.  Can someone please let us know
>> how we should proceed?>>  


>> Thanks much in advance,


>> Vivek


> 


> This message and any attachment may contain information that is
> confidential and/or proprietary. Any use, disclosure, copying,
> storing, or distribution of this e-mail or any attached file by anyone
> other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply
> email and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.> This e-mail message and any attachments to it are intended only for
> the named recipients and may contain legally privileged and/or
> confidential information. If you are not one of the intended
> recipients, do not duplicate or forward this e-mail message.> _________________________________________________
> caldeveloper-l mailing list
> caldeveloper-l at lists.calconnect.org
> http://lists.calconnect.org/listinfo.cgi/caldeveloper-l-calconnect.org

Links:

  1. http://www.linkedin.com/company/ultimate-software
  2. https://twitter.com/UltimateHCM
  3. http://blog.ultimatesoftware.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.calconnect.org/pipermail/caldeveloper-l-calconnect.org/attachments/20170816/46b48b83/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 19082 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.calconnect.org/pipermail/caldeveloper-l-calconnect.org/attachments/20170816/46b48b83/attachment-0001.png>